| I read it by curiosity, but I never considered it as some kind of revolutionary artwork, I already had some idea about the content and it's not worth reading | The book allegedly gives solutions for three problems: Democracy, Economy and Social |
|---|---|
| He pointed it at a cat lounging in a pile of refuse and grinned | Entertaining, funny in parts, hard to accept in others - as a white american who wasn't around in the 1960's, the racism was mind boggling and I couldn't help but feel shame |
Gaddafi was a "socialist" a word which is a linguistic nothing, as it can mean every position under the sun - for us, socialism just means communism, which most so called "socialists" are against , and yet see how it says the exact same thing as this line in Imperium by Francis Parker Yockey, a literal Neo-Nazi: "Feminism liberated women from the natural dignity of their sex and turned them into inferior men.
16| Overall the book seemed idealistic at times, but in the end it was a read which contained some very thought provoking points | |
|---|---|
| However, as the disparate pair witness and endure America's appalling injustices on the road, they find a newfound respect for each other's talents and start to face them together | They are like blossoms which are created to attract pollen and to produce seeds |
| The book was first published in 1975 | " Someone should have told Mr |
|---|---|
| Its not great political treatise | This is because it hits on a few fundamentally problems that most people will intuitively deal with for instance: - Western style democracies are quite undemocratic -The current state of the Imagine a really hasty communist manifesto with no conclusion and very little argument for an ideology which is a call to a return to a natural and genuinely democratic society |